Well-being as an important focus for and outcome of psychotherapy
Submission type
SymposiumScheduled
Parallel Session VI: Verwey kamer, 09-06-2018, 13:00 - 14:30Kernwoorden
Well-being, recovery, positive psychotherapy & psychologyOnderzoeksgebied
AdultsBeknopte samenvatting van de totale bijdrage
There is growing recognition that well-being is an important indicator of mental health and focus for psychotherapy. Full recovery is not only the absence of mental illness but the presence of well-being as well. This theme is covered in four clinical studies highlighting various underpinnings and perspectives on well-being.Auteurs
Ernst Bohlmeijer
Validation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form and the dual continua model of well-being and psychopathology in an adult mental health setting
Franken, K (Katinka), Lamers, S.M.A. (Lamers), ten Klooster, P.M. (Peter), Bohlmeijer, E.T. (Ernst), Westerhof, G.J. (Gerben)
Abstract ID
1153Submission type
Oral onlyIntroductie
There is growing evidence that psychopathology and well-being are two related but distinct dimensions of mental health. This so-called dual continua model has important implications for measuring outcomes in mental health care.Materiaal en methodes
This article draws on Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) data of 472 adult patients with mental health problems (57% female; average age 40 years) registered for outpatient treatment in a Dutch mental health care institute. Well-being (MHC-SF) and psychopathology (Outcome Questionnaire-45) were measured before start of treatment in a cross-sectional design.Resultaten
Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that a model with two related factors (psychopathology and well-being) fit the data better than a single-factor model of mental health. The relation between both continua was somewhat higher for people with mood disorders than for those with developmental or personality disorders.Conclusie
The results imply that it is important to measure well-being in addition to psychopathology in mental health care and that the MHC-SF is a reliable and valid instrument to measure well-being in the clinical population.Auteurs
Katinka Franken
Lamers Lamers
Peter ten Klooster
Ernst Bohlmeijer
Gerben Westerhof
Well-being therapy as rehabilitation treatment for patients with PTSD-symptoms: A: randomized controlled trial
Radstaak, M (Mirjam), Bohlmeijer, E.T. (Bohlmeijer), Huning, M (Mirjam)
Abstract ID
1155Submission type
Oral onlyIntroductie
Many patients with PTSD continue to have substantial residual symptoms after psychological treatment which may enhance the risk of relapse. Well-being therapy (WBT) has been developed to treat the residual phase of mental disorders to prevent relapse and to promote full recovery. The aim is to compare the long-term effects of WBT with treatment-as-usual (TAU) as rehabilitation therapy in adults who successfully completed psychological treatment for PTSD.Materiaal en methodes
Recovered PTSD-patients were randomized to WBT (n =29) or TAU (n = 35). The main outcome, increase in well-being, was measured at baseline (T0), after three months (T1), six months (T2) and a year (T3).Resultaten
Increases in well-being did not differ between WBT and TAU (b = 0.09, SE b = 0.23). However, WBT was more effective than TAU when levels of well-being at baseline were low (b = -0.45, SE b = 0.18). This effect was strong at T3 (Cohen’s d = 0.95).Conclusie
WBT can be effective in the rehabilitation of patients with PTSD when levels of well-being are low.Auteurs
Mirjam Radstaak
Bohlmeijer Bohlmeijer
Mirjam Huning
The Effect of Positive Psychology Interventions on Well-Being and Distress in Clinical samples with Psychiatric or Somatic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Chakhssi, F (Farid), Kraiss, J.T. (Jannis), Spijkerman-Sommers, M (Marion), Bohlmeijer, E.T. (Bohlmeijer)
Abstract ID
1156Submission type
Oral onlyIntroductie
Although positive psychology interventions (PPIs) show beneficial effects on mental health in non-clinical populations, the current literature is inconclusive regarding its effectiveness in clinical settings. We aimed to examine the effects of PPIs on wellbeing (primary outcome), depression, anxiety, and stress (secondary outcomes) in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders.Materiaal en methodes
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PsychINFO, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for controlled studies of PPIs. Study quality for each study was rated.Resultaten
Thirty studies were included, representing 1864 patients with clinical disorders. At post-treatment, PPIs showed significant, small effect sizes for well-being (g = 0.24) and depression (g = 0.23) compared to control conditions. Significant moderate improvements were observed for anxiety (g = 0.36). Effect sizes for stress were not significant. Follow-up effects (8-12 weeks), when available, yielded similar effect sizes. Quality of the studies was low to moderate.Conclusie
These findings indicate that PPIs not only have the potential to improve well-being, but can also reduce distress in populations with clinical disorders. Given the growing interest for PPIs in clinical settings, more high quality research is warranted as to determine the effectiveness of PPIs in clinical sampleAuteurs
Farid Chakhssi
Jannis Kraiss
Marion Spijkerman-Sommers
Bohlmeijer Bohlmeijer
Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: A systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis
de Vos, J.A. (Sander), LaMare, A (Andrea), Radstaak, M (Mirjam), Bijkerk, C.A. (Charlotte), Bohlmeijer, E.T. (Ernst), Westerhof, G.J. (Gerben)